https://x.com/doctorveera/status/2044679999450664967 (https://xcancel.com/doctorveera/status/2044679999450664967)
Hacker News
Latest
How to Host a Blog on a Subdirectory Instead of a Subdomain
2026-04-17 @ 22:53:18Points: 20Comments: 14
Landmark ancient-genome study shows surprise acceleration of human evolution
2026-04-17 @ 22:30:28Points: 56Comments: 51
A simplified model of Fil-C
2026-04-17 @ 21:38:20Points: 126Comments: 65
Arc Prize Foundation (YC W26) Is Hiring a Platform Engineer for ARC-AGI-4
2026-04-17 @ 21:00:08Points: 1
Even "cat readme.txt" is not safe
2026-04-17 @ 18:43:32Points: 107Comments: 57
All 12 moonwalkers had "lunar hay fever" from dust smelling like gunpowder (2018)
2026-04-17 @ 18:17:01Points: 255Comments: 145
Show HN: Smol machines – subsecond coldstart, portable virtual machines
2026-04-17 @ 17:18:58Points: 246Comments: 89
Show HN: PanicLock – Close your MacBook lid disable TouchID –> password unlock
2026-04-17 @ 16:38:44Points: 147Comments: 61
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/washington-post-raid-pro...
Edit: I've a lot more details about the legality and precedence on the apps landing page https://paniclock.github.io/
Hyperscalers have already outspent most famous US megaprojects
2026-04-17 @ 16:23:22Points: 140Comments: 121
Spending 3 months coding by hand
2026-04-17 @ 16:19:53Points: 150Comments: 152
NASA Force
2026-04-17 @ 15:47:41Points: 238Comments: 252
Measuring Claude 4.7's tokenizer costs
2026-04-17 @ 15:29:36Points: 555Comments: 385
Slop Cop
2026-04-17 @ 15:15:24Points: 98Comments: 68
NIST gives up enriching most CVEs
2026-04-17 @ 15:09:14Points: 183Comments: 40
Claude Design
2026-04-17 @ 15:04:09Points: 886Comments: 588
Middle schooler finds coin from Troy in Berlin
2026-04-17 @ 14:41:49Points: 210Comments: 94
Iceye Open Data
2026-04-17 @ 14:37:16Points: 107Comments: 14
Healthchecks.io now uses self-hosted object storage
2026-04-17 @ 14:29:11Points: 151Comments: 64
Ban the sale of precise geolocation
2026-04-17 @ 14:25:46Points: 624Comments: 169
Isaac Asimov: The Last Question (1956)
2026-04-17 @ 12:01:19Points: 645Comments: 264
Show HN: Stage – Putting humans back in control of code review
2026-04-16 @ 17:36:29Points: 104Comments: 93
Here's a demo video: https://www.tella.tv/video/stage-demo-1pph. You can play around with some example PRs here: https://stagereview.app/explore.
Teams are moving faster than ever with AI these days, but more and more engineers are merging changes that they don't really understand. The bottleneck isn't writing code anymore, it's reviewing it.
We're two engineers who got frustrated with GitHub's UI for code review. As coding agents took off, we saw our PR backlog pile up faster than we could handle. Not only that, the PRs themselves were getting larger and harder to understand, and we found ourselves spending most of our time trying to build a mental model of what a PR was actually doing.
We built Stage to make reviewing a PR feel more like reading chapters of a book, not an unorganized set of paragraphs. We use it every day now, not just to review each other's code but also our own, and at this point we can't really imagine going back to the old GitHub UI.
What Stage does: when a PR is opened, Stage groups the changes into small, logical "chapters". These chapters get ordered in the way that makes most sense to read. For each chapter, Stage tells you what changed and specific things to double check. Once you review all the chapters, you're done reviewing the PR.
You can sign in to Stage with your GitHub account and everything is synced seamlessly (commenting, approving etc.) so it fits into the workflows you're already used to.
What we're not building: a code review bot like CodeRabbit or Greptile. These tools are great for catching bugs (and we use them ourselves!) but at the end of the day humans are responsible for what gets shipped. It's clear that reviewing code hasn't scaled the same way that writing did, and they (we!) need better tooling to keep up with the onslaught of AI generated code, which is only going to grow.
We've had a lot of fun building this and are excited to take it further. If you're like us and are also tired of using GitHub for reviewing PRs, we'd love for you to try it out and tell us what you think!